ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Analizar si informar la frecuencia de administración (FA) en el módulo de prescripción de la estación clínica de atención primaria (ECAP) del Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) mejora la adecuación de la FA de las prescripciones. Diseño: Estudio de adecuación antes-después con control no equivalente de prescripciones sin cambios en la FA. El periodo de estudio incluye desde el 1 de septiembre de 2019 hasta el 29 de febrero de 2020.Emplazamiento: Ámbito de atención primaria. Participantes: Se incluyen las prescripciones de los medicamentos con una única FA adecuada o mayoritariamente adecuada realizadas por los médicos de familia del ICS durante el periodo de estudio.IntervenciónRecomendar la FA adecuada en el módulo de prescripción. Mediciones principales: Adecuación definida como la coincidencia entre la FA prescrita y la FA adecuada. Resultados: Tras la intervención se produjo un aumento del 22,75% de prescripciones con FA adecuada. El mayor aumento se dio en los medicamentos del sistema genitourinario y hormonas sexuales. En términos absolutos, el grupo de antiinfecciosos es el que obtuvo más prescripciones con FA adecuada entre los dos periodos. Conclusiones: La intervención aumentó la adecuación en la FA de las prescripciones, lo que supone una mejora en la seguridad y en la eficacia de los tratamientos. Se evidencia que el diseño y la implantación de mejoras en los sistemas de prescripción electrónica contribuye a aumentar la calidad de la prescripción.(AU)
Objective: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. Design: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020.Location: Primary care setting. Participants: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included.Intervention: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. Main measurements: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. Results: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. Conclusions: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Prescriptions , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Medication Errors , Patient Safety , Electronic Prescribing , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. DESIGN: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020. LOCATION: Primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included. INTERVENTION: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. RESULTS: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.
Subject(s)
Electronic Prescribing , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2008, in the context of a complete computerisation of medical records, the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS, Catalan Health Institute) implemented a system in its electronic clinical workstation (ECW) to assist decision-making at the prescription level. This system is known as Self Audit, and it supports physicians in reviewing the medication of their patients. Self Audit provides lists of patients presenting medication-related problems (MRPs) that have potential for improvement, and provides therapeutic recommendations that are easy to apply from the system itself. The aim of this study was to analyse the main results derived from the use of Self Audit in primary care (PC) in Catalonia, and the effect of an incentive-based safety indicator on the results obtained. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out to analyse variations in the MRPs detected by Self Audit during 2016, 2017, and 2018 in PC in Catalonia. The effect of a safety indicator on the results obtained was also studied. This safety indicator includes the most clinically relevant MRPs (i.e., therapeutic duplications, safety alerts from the Spanish Medicines Agency, and incidences of polymedication in patients over 65 years of age). Variation in the MRPs was measured using the differences between two evaluation points (initial and final). An MRP was considered resolved if the recommendation specified in the alert was followed. The prescriptions of 6411 PC doctors of the ICS who use the ECW and provide their services to 5.8 million Catalans through 288 PC teams were analysed. RESULTS: Analysis of the total safety-based MRPs detected by Self Audit gave overall resolutions from April to December of 9% (21,547) in 2016, 7% (15,924) in 2017, and 1% (2392) in 2018 out of the total number of MRPs recorded in April each year. Examination of the 3 types of MRPs with the highest clinical relevance that were linked to the safety indicator gave overall resolutions of 41% in 2016 (17,358), 20% in 2017 (7655), and 21% in 2018 (8135). CONCLUSIONS: The ICS Self Audit tool assists in reducing the number of safety-based MRPs in a systematic manner, and yields superior results for the MRPs linked to a safety indicator included in the incentives of PC physicians.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Prescriptions , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Primary Health Care , SpainABSTRACT
Introducción: La utilización de la combinación a dosis fija de tramadol/dexketoprofeno en España y en otros países ha aumentado de forma conside-rable. La indicación terapéutica autorizada de este medicamento es el tratamiento sintomático a corto plazo del dolor agudo de moderado a intenso en pacientes adultos. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir el patrón de uso de tramadol/dexketopro-feno en el ámbito de la atención primaria de salud.Método: Se realizó un estudio transversal, descrip-tivo y multicéntrico. La población de estudio incluyó a todos los pacientes de una Dirección de Atención Primaria (53 equipos de Atención Primaria) que tenían activa la prescripción de tramadol/dexke-toprofeno el 28 de marzo de 2018. La población diana fueron aquellos pacientes a los que se les prescribió tramadol/dexketoprofeno durante más de 20 días.Resultados: Un total de 176 pacientes tenía activa la prescripción de tramadol/dexketoprofeno. Todos los pacientes (100%) tuvieron una duración del tratamiento superior a 5 días y el 72,7% (N=128) su-perior a 20 días. La duración media del tratamiento fue de 14±160,9 días en pacientes que tenían me-nos de 20 días de tratamiento y de 224±160,8 días en pacientes que tenían más de 20 días de trata-miento. El 35,1% de los pacientes estaban tratados con más de 2 medicamentos para aliviar el dolor de forma concomitante con tramadol/dexketoprofeno. El médico de atención primaria inició un 65,6% de las prescripciones.Conclusiones: La combinación a dosis fija de tramadol/dexketoprofeno se utilizó con frecuencia fuera de indicación, de acuerdo con la ficha técnica y la evidencia científica disponible. Este estudio alerta sobre los riesgos potenciales asociados a la utilización de este medicamento en la práctica clíni-ca, como son la falta de efectividad y/o la aparición de efectos adversos. (AU)
Introduction: The use of the fixed-dose combi-nation of tramadol/dexketoprofen in Spain and in other countries has increased considerably. The authorized therapeutic indication for this medicinal product is the short-term symptomatic treatment of moderate to severe acute pain in adult patients. The objective of this study was to describe the pat-tern of use of tramadol/dexketoprofen in the field of primary health care.Method: A cross-sectional, descriptive and mul-ticenter study was carried out. The study popu-lation included all patients from a Primary Care Department (53 Primary Care teams) with an active prescription of tramadol/dexketoprofen on March 28, 2018. The target population was those patients who were prescribed tramadol/dexketoprofen. dexketoprofen for >20 days.Results: A total of 176 patients had an active pre-scription for tramadol/dexketoprofen. All patients (100%) had a duration of treatment greater than 5 days and 72.7% (N=128) greater than 20 days. The mean duration of treatment was 14±160.9 days in patients who had less than 20 days of treatment and 224±160.8 days in patients who had more than 20 days of treatment. 35.1% of the patients were treated with >2 pain medications and concomi-tantly with tramadol/dexketoprofen. The general practitioner initiated 65.6% of the prescriptions.Conclusions: The fixed-dose combination of tra-madol/dexketoprofen was frequently used off-la-bel, according to the product characteristics and the available scientific evidence. This study warns about the potential risks associated with the use of this drug in clinical practice, such as lack of effec-tiveness and/or the appearance of adverse effects (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Primary Health Care , Evidence-Based Practice , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2008, the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS, Catalan Health Institute) implemented a prescription decision support system in its electronic clinical workstation (ECW), which automatically generates online alerts for general practitioners when a possible medication-related problem (MRP) is detected. This tool is known as PREFASEG, and at the time of beginning a new treatment, it automatically assesses the suitability of the treatment for the individual patient. This analysis is based on ongoing treatments, demographic characteristics, existing pathologies, and patient biochemical variables. As a result of the assessment, therapeutic recommendations are provided. The objective of this study is to present the PREFASEG tool, analyse the main alerts that it generates, and determine the degree of alert acceptance. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out to analyse the generation of MRP-related alerts detected by PREFASEG during 2016, 2017, and 2018 in primary care (PC) in Catalonia. The number of MRP alerts generated, the drugs involved, and the acceptance/rejection of the alerts were analysed. An alert was considered "accepted" when the medication that generated the alert was not prescribed, thereby following the recommendation given by the tool. The MRP alerts studied were therapeutic duplications, safety alerts issued by the Spanish Medicines Agency, and drugs not recommended for use in geriatrics. The prescriptions issued by 6411 ICS PC physicians who use the ECW and provide their services to 5.8 million Catalans through 288 PC teams were analysed. RESULTS: During the 3 years examined, 67.2 million new prescriptions were analysed, for which PREFASEG generated 4,379,866 alerts (1 for every 15 new treatments). A total of 1,222,159 alerts (28%) were accepted. Pharmacological interactions and therapeutic duplications were the most detected alerts, representing 40 and 30% of the total alerts, respectively. The main pharmacological groups involved in the safety alerts were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: During the period analysed, 28% of the prescriptions wherein a toxicity-related PREFASEG alert was generated led to treatment modification, thereby helping to prevent the generation of potential safety MRPs. However, the tool should be further improved to increase alert acceptance and thereby improve patient safety.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Medical Order Entry Systems , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Clinical Decision-Making , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Interactions , Humans , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Prescriptions , Primary Health Care , SpainABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the use of tapentadol and the combination oxycodone/naloxone in primary health care. Data on their use and possible misuse will allow the identification of risk factors and to design protocols to reduce and prevent avoidable harm to patients being treated for pain. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional and multicenter study was performed. SETTING: Fifty-three primary health care teams, which provides healthcare for 1,300,000 inhabitants. PATIENTS: A total of 1840 patients had active prescriptions of tapentadol and 985 of oxycodone/naloxone. METHODS: Demographic (age, sex) and clinical (glomerular filtration rate; active liver disease; dosing and duration of treatment), prescribed daily dose (according to age, sex, length of treatment), concomitant analgesic treatment and diagnosis. Patient information was obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Most of the patients were women (>74.0% in both cases), and the average age was 69.3 years (women: 70.1±13.2; men: 66.7±13.9 years) in the case of tapentadol and 70.6 years (women: 64.0±13.6; men: 72.6±14.3 years) in the case of oxycodone/naloxone. Only 12.2% of patients taking tapentadol and 12.1% taking oxycodone/naloxone had a normal renal function. In both cases, 4.1% of patients had active liver disease. The average length of treatment was 246.4 days in oxycodone/naloxone and 199.0 days in tapentadol. It was recorded that 85.1% of patients in the case of tapentadol and 89.0% in the oxycodone/naloxone had at least another drug prescribed for pain. About 42.2% of patients treated with tapentadol and 34.4% of patients treated with oxycodone/naloxone had associated neuralgia as a diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The pattern of use and profile of patients with tapentadol and oxycodone/naloxone had more similarities than differences, and suggested that prescribing practice, and monitoring should be assessed regularly to ensure patient safety and effective management of pain.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the pattern of use of pregabalin and the appropriateness of treatment, so that interventions could be designed to improve various clinical approaches to the use of pregabalin to include unlicensed indications. Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study was performed between April 2014 and January 2015. Setting: Fifty-three primary health care centers covering 1,250,000 inhabitants. Subjects: A total of 10,155 patients with pregabalin prescriptions. Methods: Demographic (gender, age) and clinical (licensed indications for pregabalin, treatment duration, dosing schedule, diagnoses, kidney function, previous treatment with pregabalin, and additional drug treatment combined with pregabalin) variables obtained from health records were studied. The indicators were related to the daily dose of pregabalin, diagnoses, and treatment. Results: A total of 64.2% of patients treated with pregabalin were female (mean age = 62.3 years; SD = 15.2 years). Twenty-nine patients were younger than age 18 years. A total of 68.2% of patients were taking pregabalin for an appropriate indication, 45.2% were using pregabalin off-label for bone and joint pain, and 15.1% were using pregabalin for fibromyalgia. A total of 71.9% of patients started treatment with pregabalin without previously using firstline drugs, such as amitriptyline or gabapentin, and 66% of active treatments had been initiated during the year before the study. In 47% of patients with glomerular filtration rates lower than 15 mL/min, the dose exceeded the maximum. Conclusions: Our study reveals that pregabalin is used for unlicensed indications and often when firstline drugs have not been trialed and suggests that better routines in diagnosis and prescription may improve treatment outcomes. Our study also provides novel information about the use of doses of pregabalin that are higher than recommended for patients with renal impairment.
